Meta:Requests for deletion
{{subst:RFD2|page name|reasons here. --~~~~}} under the appropriate section to start the deletion discussion. As a courtesy, you may wish to inform the principal authors of the page about the request using {{subst:RfD notice|page name --~~~~.}}. After at least one week, an administrator will close and carry out the consensus or majority decision.
Articles that qualify for speedy deletion should be tagged with {{delete}} or {{delete|reason}}, and should not be listed here. (See also speedy deletion candidates.) Files with no sources should be tagged with {{no source}} and need not be listed here, either. To request undeletion, see #Requests for undeletion. See Meta:Inclusion policy for a general list of what does not belong on the Meta-Wiki.
Previous requests are archived. Deletion requests ({{Deletion requests}}) can be added to talk page to remember previous RfDs.
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day.
|
Pages
[edit]Submit your page deletion request at the bottom of this section.
Created in error at MediaWiki:Globalblocking-block-reason-dropdown. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:22, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Deleteonce MediaWiki:Globalblocking-block-reason-dropdown is fixed. There are several more instances of this typo, which I'll fix as well. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 03:37, 29 October 2025 (UTC)- There are "only" 2043 block summaries that need fixing. As @Johannnes89 was the one who introduced the typo, I propose that he carry out the task of fixing them. I'll deliver him a trout too. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 04:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for noticing. Not sure if it's worth the effort changing all those block summaries, how about just leaving this page as a redirect for ~1 year and delete it once most of the blocks are expired? Johannnes89 (talk) 10:15, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- Agreed. It's not really worth fixing that. It'd be a rather pointless work to do. Leave a redirect for some time and have it deleted later. -Barras talk 10:25, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- That does sound like a better choice. Delayed delete per above. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 10:52, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- Fine with me. Just curious, when will the last gblock expire? --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:53, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Minorax: According to this new query, there are 9 indefinite blocks. Another 400+ will expire in 2030, and there are plenty of 2028s. Only to be expected, since these are for open proxies. I guess they still need to be fixed after all. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 11:07, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hmm I had hoped for most blocks to expire after 1-2 years. Fixed the indefinite blocks and some more, but unless we want to keep the page as a redirect for five years I guess I need to fix at least the 400+ expiring 2030. Johannnes89 (talk) 12:28, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Johannnes89: The numbers for each year are: 87 (2025; 33 expired, 17 expiring this month), 329 (2026), 250 (2027), 957 (2028) and 411 (2030) We might as well fix all of them. Can other stewards help? NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 05:40, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Johannnes89: Any update on this? Maybe you could automate this fix with a script. – DreamRimmer ■ 12:01, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
- I will try and take a look tomorrow. -- XXBlackburnXx (talk) 00:09, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry didn't have much time recently. Writing scripts is not really my strong suit, so I'm happy if someone else could help. Johannnes89 (talk) 10:35, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
- Any updates? --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:29, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
- This has been pending for a long time, and there has been no recent response from the stewards. I am happy to assist in resolving it. If any steward is interested, please let me know, and I can provide the script and explain how to use it if needed. @Johannnes89 – DreamRimmer ■ 13:33, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- @DreamRimmer I would appreciate your support Johannnes89 (talk) 13:46, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
- This task is now
complete. A total of 1,896 global blocks and 1,903 local blocks have been modified. I thank EPIC for running the script for the global block modifications. This discussion can now be closed. – DreamRimmer ■ 04:48, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
- This task is now
- @DreamRimmer I would appreciate your support Johannnes89 (talk) 13:46, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
- This has been pending for a long time, and there has been no recent response from the stewards. I am happy to assist in resolving it. If any steward is interested, please let me know, and I can provide the script and explain how to use it if needed. @Johannnes89 – DreamRimmer ■ 13:33, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- I will try and take a look tomorrow. -- XXBlackburnXx (talk) 00:09, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Johannnes89: Any update on this? Maybe you could automate this fix with a script. – DreamRimmer ■ 12:01, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Johannnes89: The numbers for each year are: 87 (2025; 33 expired, 17 expiring this month), 329 (2026), 250 (2027), 957 (2028) and 411 (2030) We might as well fix all of them. Can other stewards help? NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 05:40, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
- Hmm I had hoped for most blocks to expire after 1-2 years. Fixed the indefinite blocks and some more, but unless we want to keep the page as a redirect for five years I guess I need to fix at least the 400+ expiring 2030. Johannnes89 (talk) 12:28, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Minorax: According to this new query, there are 9 indefinite blocks. Another 400+ will expire in 2030, and there are plenty of 2028s. Only to be expected, since these are for open proxies. I guess they still need to be fixed after all. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 11:07, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- Fine with me. Just curious, when will the last gblock expire? --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:53, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- That does sound like a better choice. Delayed delete per above. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 10:52, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- Agreed. It's not really worth fixing that. It'd be a rather pointless work to do. Leave a redirect for some time and have it deleted later. -Barras talk 10:25, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for noticing. Not sure if it's worth the effort changing all those block summaries, how about just leaving this page as a redirect for ~1 year and delete it once most of the blocks are expired? Johannnes89 (talk) 10:15, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- ┌───────────────────────────────────────────┘
@DreamRimmer: You can do it yourself, can't you? NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 05:20, 30 December 2025 (UTC)- I could have handled this myself, but I preferred to leave it for a second set of eyes. – DreamRimmer ■ 05:26, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
- There are "only" 2043 block summaries that need fixing. As @Johannnes89 was the one who introduced the typo, I propose that he carry out the task of fixing them. I'll deliver him a trout too. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 04:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Deleted – DreamRimmer ■ 06:03, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Files
[edit]Submit your image deletion request at the bottom of this section.
Redirects
[edit]Submit your redirect deletion request at the bottom of this section.
Requests for undeletion
[edit]Submit your undeletion request at the bottom of this section.
